ICO moves to calm controversy over TTP patient data sharing
- 21 March 2017
The Information Commissioner’s Office (ICO) says thousands of GPs using TPP should not switch off “enhanced” information sharing, despite ongoing concerns about the security of patient information, due to the potential impact on patient care.
Controversy over security in TPP’s SystmOne, the electronic patient record systems used by about 2700 GP practices in England, reignited over the weekend, after it was picked up by the Telegraph.
The Telegraph reported that that the security of up to 26 million patients medical records could at risk because of a sharing function in SystmOne, which potentially allowed patient records to be viewed by “thousands of strangers”.
Earlier this month, Digital Health News reported that the ICO was investigating SystmOne’s “enhanced data sharing” function, which allows people with access to SystmOne to view patient record remotely.
TPP have said users should only use the function to view records having first obtained patient’s consent for direct care but the ICO said it was concerned about SystmOne’s ” data protection compliance”.
In a new statement issued today, the ICO said while concerns around the enhanced data sharing function remained, GPs should not be turning off the sharing function.
“The ICO has data protection compliance concerns about SystmOne’s enhanced data sharing function and the potential risk to patients’ medical records held by GPs,” the statement said.
“However, given the possible impact to patient care, the ICO is not advocating that users switch off data sharing at this stage.”
Ongoing concerns about SystmOne related specifically “fair and lawful” processing of patient data and having adequate security around that information.
The ICO said NHS Digital, TPP and NHS England were already putting place an “initial plan” to fix these shortcomings, with “further work planned”.
In statement supplied by NHS Digital, covering “the NHS”, a spokesperson said: “We are aware that the Information Commissioner’s Office have raised data protection compliance concerns. NHS organisations are already supporting TPP to respond to the issues raised working closely with the ICO and GP leaders – and the full response plan will be implemented by summer.”
NHS chief clinical information officer Keith McNeil said access to good information was essential for effective care but it should be managed “fairly and lawfully, with the highest levels of security and safety”.
Any inappropriate use of patient data could also be picked up through electronic audits that were routinely performed by all major GP IT system suppliers, he said.
“We are currently working with TPP and GP representatives to address concerns raised by ICO.”
When the news broke earlier this month, medical privacy group MedConfidential said: “Failures of this sort are exactly why patients must be able to see by which organisations their GP records have been accessed by.”
However, the medical privacy watchdog also warned against patients hastily opting out of the information sharing scheme.
“For many people, turning off “sharing out” is an option that may affect your care, even in the medium term, while TPP fixes the problem.”
TPP introduced the enhanced data sharing function in 2012, creating a nationwide capability to share patient information across health and social care services organisations running the SystmOne electronic patient record system.
In a lengthy blog post responding the coverage of patient data concerns, the company said the sharing scheme is only meant to be used for direct care. Patients have control over who sees their health and care information through their GP, who acted as a data controller, the company said.
The company said it was not aware of any complaints being made against data controllers in respect to how they were the data sharing scheme.
Digital Health News approached TPP for additional comment for this story.
5 Comments
My data was shared without my permission, nationally, and only came to my attention when I noticed my SCR sheet accompanying a referral letter. The IT Mgr thanked me for pointing out the error in their system, but that it was “too late,….its out there now”. The repercussions have been life changing. It seems there are or were, 3 or 4 categories under which past history could be listed. This decision was made (by whom?) arbitrarily and in my case, carelessly, and without my, the patient’s input. I have been unable to have clarified where this data went, whether it was edited, etc. I am prevented from making an official complaint as there is a form of blackmail whereby information is withheld from the patient “if there is a pending complaint with any Trust”! I am considering having myself “wiped” by applying through the Dept of Health as I already feel like a persona non grata. Ironically, the past history should have included 3 major health events which were missing from my records, and not past, resolved, transient matters relating to traumatic life events. I have been in communication with Dame Fiona and will be seeing my MP. But it’s rather like the police policing the police. It’s all the Government, silly. What a haphazard, amateurish, shambles; beyond compare. I feel disposable; collateral damage. This system emphatically does nothing to help or assist patient care. It is toxic to the patient.
That is definitely a good idea.
William [retired Caldicott Guardian]
Can the GP see the audit of who has viewed the records – I have been advocating that patients should be able to see this audit (along with their consent options) within their online access views
Yes, my understanding is that they can. I don’t think this issue is nearly as serious as has been implied by the press. However, I believe TPP have a plan to do just as you suggest and share the audit.
I too have been advocating such an approach for some time. (http://www.xml-solutions.com/the-secret-to-overcoming-patient-consent-concerns/) I suspect the NHS will begin to do this increasingly over the next few years.
Comments are closed.